Implementation of Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) in the Beef Industry
نویسنده
چکیده
The central notion of COOL, to provide consumers with information about the source of beef products, seems simple enough and not likely to generate much inherent opposition. However, the issues involved in development of the COOL law and the implementation in the beef industry have proven to be the source of significant contention. Much of the support for the inclusion of COOL in the 2002 Farm Bill came from elements of the beef industry but the provisions were immediately resisted vigorously by other industry sectors and have continued to be a lightning rod for policy disputes that have often pitted producer against producer (Kay, 2003, 2003). The controversy over COOL within the beef industry can be broadly grouped into three areas of contention: 1) the specific language and implications for implementation of the COOL law; 2) the motivation for the law; and 3) the question of costs and benefits to the industry.
منابع مشابه
Who Will Bear the Costs of Country-of-Origin Labeling?
Several studies have attempted to quantify the expected costs of COOL (Davis, 2003; Hayes & Meyer, 2003). Annual cost estimates for the beef industry range from $200 million to $6.4 billion and from $20 million to $1 billion for the pork industry. Proponents of COOL argue that most of the larger cost estimates are overstated. They also emphasize results of experimental auctions and surveys that...
متن کاملCountry-of-Origin Labeling and the Beef Industry
Country-of-origin labeling (COOL) was probably the most contentious issue to come out of the 2002 farm bill. This issue of Choices features COOL as one thematic contribution. Some agricultural and consumer advocacy groups, notably US cow-calf producer and fruit and vegetable grower and shipper associations, have argued for legislation that would require suppliers to provide consumers with count...
متن کاملPotential Impact of Country-of-Origin Labeling on Beef Industry Structure
Nothing about COOL has been particularly simple. In fact, COOL provisions represented one of the most vigorously debated elements of the 2002 Farm Bill. Nowhere was the debate over COOL more contentious than within the beef industry. Among beef industry participants at all levels, arguments over COOL scarcely abated (and probably intensified) after the Farm Bill was passed. Predictably, much of...
متن کاملCountry-of-Origin Labeling of Beef Products: U.S. Consumers’ Perceptions
In 2002, consumers in Chicago and Denver were surveyed and participated in an experimental auction to elicit their willingness-to-pay for country-of-origin labeling (COOL) of beef. Survey results indicate that the majority of consumers (73%) were willing to pay an 11% and 24% premium for COOL of steak and hamburger, respectively. In the auction, consumers were willing to pay a 19% premium for s...
متن کاملPartial Implementation of COOL: Economic Effects in the U.S. Seafood Industry
Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling (MCOOL) was implemented on seafood in the United States on April 4, 2005. MCOOL exempts the foodservice sector and excludes processed seafood from labeling. This paper contributes to understanding the economics of the MCOOL law for seafood by showing that current partial implementation may have unintended consequences on the domestic supply chain. While labe...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010